The Transformation of Islamic Legal Principles in Contemporary National Legislation: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Harmonization

Authors

  • Iffat Sulthan Ulya Harniz Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Khatibul Umam Departemen Hukum Islam, Fakultas Hukum UGM, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Islamic Law; Codification; National Legislation; Comparative Law; Legal Certainty

Abstract

Muslim-majority states no longer apply Islamic law as a jurists’ discourse but as state-enacted legislation, so that the resulting norms derive their binding force from the constitution rather than from scholarly authority. In Indonesia this transformation has proceeded through at least four different channels, each with its own criterion of validity, producing a layered normativity that threatens legal certainty. This study explains how Islamic legal principles acquire state validity, identifies the structural pathologies of that process, and proposes an operational standard for assessing the quality of legal harmonization. The research is normative juridical and doctrinal, combining statutory, conceptual, and case approaches with a functional comparison of Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Egypt, and Pakistan, supported by a socio-legal reading and by maqasid reasoning as an internal normative framework. Transformation operates through substantive codification, referential incorporation of fatwa, jurisdictional transfer, and asymmetric territorial regulation. Indonesia harmonizes purposively rather than textually, yet three pathologies persist: an unsettled validity channel for fatwa, hierarchical and horizontal disharmony among instruments, and an unresolved rights-compatibility gap. The comparison shows that the decisive variable is not the volume of Islamic content but the allocation of authority to determine compliance and the reviewability of that determination. Harmonization should be tested against four cumulative criteria, namely constitutional validity, purposive justification, institutional competence, and empirically verified non-discriminatory benefit.

References

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.

Barlinti, Yeni Salma. “Harmonization of Islamic Law in National Legal System: A Comparative Study Between Indonesian Law and Malaysian Law.” Indonesia Law Review 1, no. 1 (2011). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v1n1.95.

Bowen, John R. Islam, Law and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Buskens, Léon. “Recent Debates on Family Law Reform in Morocco: Islamic Law as Politics in an Emerging Public Sphere.” Islamic Law and Society 10, no. 1 (2003): 70–131. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851903321196294.

Coulson, Noel J. A History of Islamic Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1964.

Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.

Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. Rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.

al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad. al-Mustaṣfā min ʿIlm al-Uṣūl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1993.

Hallaq, Wael B. Sharīʿa: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

———. The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.

Hamzani, Achmad Irwan. “Nasab Anak Luar Kawin Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1214.

Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.

Hooker, M. B. Indonesian Syariah: Defining a National School of Islamic Law. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008.

Hosen, Nadirsyah. Shari’a and Constitutional Reform in Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2007.

Ibn ʿĀshūr, Muhammad al-Ṭāhir. Treatise on Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. Translated by Mohamed El-Tahir El-Mesawi. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2006.

Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, Muḥammad ibn Abī Bakr. Iʿlām al-Muwaqqiʿīn ʿan Rabb al-ʿĀlamīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1991.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Shariʿah Law: An Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld, 2008.

Karimullah, Suud Sarim. “Pursuing Legal Harmony: Indonesianization of Islamic Law Concept and Its Impact on National Law.” Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 21, no. 2 (2022): 213–44. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v21i2.4800.

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. Konsep-Konsep Hukum dalam Pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni, 2002.

Lombardi, Clark B. State Law as Islamic Law in Modern Egypt: The Incorporation of the Sharīʿa into Egyptian Constitutional Law. Leiden: Brill, 2006.

Lukito, Ratno. Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Bridging the Unbridgeable. London: Routledge, 2013.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Rev. ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Masud, Muhammad Khalid. Shatibi’s Philosophy of Islamic Law. Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, 1995.

Mukharrom, Tamyiz, and Supriyanto Abdi. “Harmonizing Islam and Human Rights Through the Reconstruction of Classical Islamic Tradition.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2023): 40–57.

Nurlaelawati, Euis. Modernization, Tradition and Identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and Legal Practice in the Indonesian Religious Courts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010.

Radbruch, Gustav. “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).” Translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041.

Salim, Arskal. Challenging the Secular State: The Islamization of Law in Modern Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2008.

Schacht, Joseph. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.

al-Shāṭibī, Abū Isḥāq. al-Muwāfaqāt fī Uṣūl al-Sharīʿa. Cairo: Dār Ibn ʿAffān, 1997.

Siroj, A. Malthuf, Ismail Marzuki, and Elkhairati. “Transformation and Future Challenges of Islamic Law in Indonesia.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2023): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6618.

Teubner, Gunther. “Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences.” Modern Law Review 61, no. 1 (1998): 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00125.

Watson, Alan. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. 2nd ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1993.

Welchman, Lynn. Women and Muslim Family Laws in Arab States: A Comparative Overview of Textual Development and Advocacy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.

Yasardin, and S. B. Kooria. “Revisiting the Compilation of Islamic Economic Law in Indonesia: Legal Challenges and Pathways to Harmonization.” JURIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 24, no. 1 (2025): 127–36. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i1.13736.

Yezar, Dimas Muhammad, and Faisal Riza. “Legal Harmonization Between Aceh’s Qanun Jinayat and Indonesia’s National Criminal Code.” Abdurrauf Law and Sharia 3, no. 1 (2026): 111–31. https://doi.org/10.70742/arlash.v3i1.572.

Zweigert, Konrad, and Hein Kötz. An Introduction to Comparative Law. 3rd ed. Translated by Tony Weir. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

Legislation, Regulations, and Court Decisions

Aceh. Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law.

Egypt. Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt of 2014, Article 2.

Indonesia. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

———. Law No. 7 of 1989 concerning the Religious Judicature, as amended by Law No. 3 of 2006 and Law No. 50 of 2009.

———. Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, as amended by Law No. 16 of 2019.

———. Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf.

———. Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning the Governing of Aceh.

———. Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking.

———. Law No. 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Legislation, as amended by Law No. 15 of 2019 and Law No. 13 of 2022.

———. Law No. 23 of 2011 concerning Zakat Management.

———. Law No. 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Assurance, as amended by Law No. 6 of 2023.

———. Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.

———. Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 1991 concerning the Dissemination of the Compilation of Islamic Law.

———. Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2008 concerning the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law.

———. Supreme Court Regulation No. 14 of 2016 concerning the Procedure for the Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes.

———. Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, 17 February 2012.

———. Constitutional Court Decision No. 86/PUU-X/2012, 31 October 2013.

———. Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012, 29 August 2013.

———. Constitutional Court Decision No. 68/PUU-XII/2014, 18 June 2015.

———. Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XV/2017, 18 December 2018.

Malaysia. Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009 (Act 701), sections 56–57.

———. Federal Constitution of Malaysia, Article 121(1A) and Ninth Schedule, List II.

———. JRI Resources Sdn Bhd v Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Bhd, Federal Court of Malaysia, decision of 10 April 2019.

Morocco. Dahir No. 1-04-22 of 3 February 2004 promulgating Law No. 70-03 constituting the Family Code (Moudawana).

Pakistan. Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973, Article 203D.

———. Federal Shariat Court, judgment on the elimination of ribā, 28 April 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-09

How to Cite

Iffat Sulthan Ulya Harniz, & Khatibul Umam. (2026). The Transformation of Islamic Legal Principles in Contemporary National Legislation: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Harmonization. Journal AL-ARMI of Recht, 1(1). Retrieved from https://journal.yayasanwakaftozan.org/index.php/jar/article/view/40